Skip to content
DurhamCountsDurham, in numbers.Local help →

Durham · England

Issues

County Durham council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats drawn from the available evidence. These are analytical judgements, not an official council assessment. Where a national comparison is available, lower housing costs, lower reported poor health and higher qualification shares are treated as relative strengths; this does not prove affordability or service quality.

Strengths

strength

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £650 a month (August 2026) in County Durham council area. This is £809 lower than the England average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 9% in North Lodge to 38.3% in Elvet, Gilesgate & Shincliffe — a gap of 29.3 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

What could help →

Weaknesses

weakness

Bring support closer to people in poor health

7.5% of people reported bad or very bad health in County Durham council area (21 March 2021). Across England, the figure was 5.2%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 1.4% in Neville's Cross to 12.4% in Horden & Dene House — a gap of 11.1 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

What could help →

Opportunities

opportunity

Tie Aykley Heads infrastructure to viable next stages

Aykley Heads has staged infrastructure funding, while later development proposals still require full business cases.

Proposed response: Make each infrastructure commitment traceable to the development stage it enables.

What could help →

opportunity

Plan homes and care around an older population

21.3% of people in County Durham council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 10.3% in Neville's Cross to 30.3% in Barnard Castle — a gap of 20 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

What could help →

opportunity

Connect local skills to local opportunities

26.7% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in County Durham council area. Across England, the figure was 33.9%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 3.1% in Neville's Cross to 31.2% in Horden & Dene House — a gap of 28 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

What could help →

opportunity

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in County Durham council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

What could help →

opportunity

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

What could help →

opportunity

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 6.2% in Neville's Cross to 33.8% in Horden & Dene House — a gap of 27.6 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

What could help →

Threats

threat

Tie cleaner-air measures to results on affected streets

Durham’s cleaner-air plan has been adopted, but the test is what happens to pollution and travel choices afterwards.

Proposed response: Publish delivery progress alongside comparable monitoring results and the costs of each measure.

Evidence 1 · Evidence 2

What could help →

Which response goes with each issue?