Sacriston & Witton Gilbert ward · County Durham. Every figure carries its own date.
Boundary: May 2026. Census and crime records have different dates and purposes.
What makes this ward different?
Homes rented from a council or housing association: 24% here, compared with 20% across County Durham (4.2 percentage points higher).
The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Homes rented privately: 14% here, compared with 17% across County Durham (3 percentage points lower).
A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 25.8% here, compared with 26.7% across County Durham (0.9 percentage points lower).
Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Police-recorded locations for Sacriston & Witton Gilbert ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.
922 mapped crimes
September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 803 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.
Mapped crime over time
September 2024 to August 2026
Sacriston & Witton Gilbert ward · mapped crimes
Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.
Shown on this chart: 61 mapped crimes in September 2024; 77 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.
53.874.895.8
September 2024August 2026
The line joins consecutive published observations.
Hover or tap the chart for a value. Use the date slider with touch or arrow keys. Escape closes the chart label.
Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Sacriston & Witton Gilbert
Month
Mapped crime
Anti-social behaviour
September 2024
61
8
October 2024
58
12
November 2024
69
12
December 2024
73
9
January 2025
63
18
February 2025
75
8
March 2025
58
10
April 2025
62
20
May 2025
63
31
June 2025
67
24
July 2025
78
12
August 2025
76
18
September 2025
70
32
October 2025
80
19
November 2025
82
9
December 2025
66
4
January 2026
73
14
February 2026
75
18
March 2026
93
19
April 2026
73
17
May 2026
69
11
June 2026
85
18
July 2026
79
12
August 2026
77
21
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Sacriston & Witton Gilbert
Category
Mapped crimes
violent crime
434
criminal damage arson
138
shoplifting
89
public order
66
other theft
48
burglary
43
vehicle crime
38
other crime
37
drugs
15
possession of weapons
6
theft from the person
5
robbery
2
bicycle theft
1
What these numbers include
Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.
Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and records without usable locations are excluded.
Do not compare directly with Scottish council-level recorded crime totals.
These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.
Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.
